He needs everyone to be pulling in the same direction as he is. Unfortunately, after a number of years working in the education system, I'm filled with cynicism.
Link 1 says, "schools to simplify administrative processes and get more centralised support" - I hate dealing with financial matters. If I had wanted to deal with financial matters, I wouldn't have gone into teaching.
Also if by some miracle they manage to simplify the processes? That should leave teachers with more time but that would never happen because that time will be filled up with new stuff that they will come up with. More meetings, trainings or some new acronym to implement.
Link 2 says, "MOE to deepen expertise, raise career prospects for teachers". I entered teaching because I wanted to touch lives. Corny but true. I still do. All I want is for the MOE to leave me alone so that I can teach. I've never seen it as a career that I must advance along.
Think about it. If you love teaching and you do well in some aspects of it. The school recognizes your potential and they promote you. That's great right? No, not if you love teaching. Each promotion reduces the time you have in contact with students, takes you further away from the very reason you entered teaching. It's frustrating. Look at what is being advocated in the article, there will be principal master teachers, lead teachers and senior teachers.
The problem with this is that every level that they create, in the name of giving teachers an illusion of progress in their careers, needs justification. That justification comes in creating another layer of work.
The Principal Master Teachers need to do some stuff to show they deserve their salary, they create work for those below them. (Lead Teachers and Senior Teachers --> Teachers)
The Lead Teachers need to show they deserve their salary, they create work for those below them. (Senior Teachers --> Teachers)
The cycle carries on with the Senior Teachers and the ones ending up with the beggar's end of the bargain? The ordinary teacher.
Link 3 says - "Teachers to get more training, support and mentorship" and "Just as we bring out the best in every child (debatable), our education system must also bring out the best in all our teachers" - Let's get something straight. Every year, teachers get asked about how to improve the life of a teacher and what's the area they feel the most improvement can be made. No teacher is going to tell you that they need more training. The answer invariably has to do with time or the lack thereof.
Teachers don't have enough time because they are in a constant struggle with an entity that sucks up their time. Said entity needs you to attend an endless stream of training when the knowledge you have is sufficient for the level you are teaching. That training however must still be attended because teachers must be life-long learners. It is amazing how humans create these cycles that lock themselves in a cycle of uselessness. Not saying that all training is useless but it does feel that way when you have to look for courses to fulfill that quota of 100 hours.
Bah, I could go on but I shan't.
Looked back on what I typed and realized it's a messy rant. To summarize;
1) MOE is top heavy
2) MOE has in place a system that asks its officers to do more than is expected
3) Each rank in the hierarchy tries its best to justify its reason for existing - resulting in more work
4) Said word trickles down to the lowest rank which has nowhere else to push it to.
Summed up by ...






